ERC/Kernel Working Group Meeting Report: Shanghai Meeting

Shanghai Meeting

October 2004, Shanghai DC 2004

John A. Kunze,[email protected]

<人力资源> < h2 >的内容表示< / h2 > < h3 > < ul > 
  • Kernel Metadata at a Glance

  • Working Group Status

  • Documentation efforts

  • ERC/Kernel Demos and Software

  • Creating best-practice guidelines

  • Kernel Working Group Recommended Next Steps

  • Reference Information


  • Kernel Metadata at a Glance

    • Kernel Semantics: four required elements

      • who - a responsible person or party

      • what - a name or other human-oriented identifier

      • when - a date important in the object's lifecycle

      • where - a location or system-oriented identifier

    • ERC Syntax: Electronic Resource Citation

      erc: who: Lederberg, Joshua what: Studies of Human Families for Genetic Linkage when: 1974 where: http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/BB/AA/TT/tt.pdf


    First |Next|Contents
    ERC/Kernel Working Group Meeting Report
    October 2004, Shanghai DC 2004
    John A. Kunze,[email protected]

    Working Group Status

    • ERC/Kernel WG Charter (October 2002):

      • to explore the ultra-simple ERC "kernel" approach to metadata

      • to identify applications of the compact ERC record format

      • to refine ERC value rules and minimum element requirements

      • to develop an XML representation of kernel elements

    • 50 subscribers to the mailing list (October 2004)

    • New 6-point work plan (August 2004): much progress to report

    • Second face-to-face meeting




    Previous|Next|Contents
    ERC/Kernel Working Group Meeting Report
    October 2004, Shanghai DC 2004
    John A. Kunze,[email protected]

    Documentation efforts

    • Draft Kernel Metadata Specification, now available at

      //www.voudr.com/groups/kernel/spec.html
    • Creating an XML mapping to/from the ERC format

      • No progress to date

      • Critical for interoperation, exchange, import/export

    • Looking for volunteers for writing and/or editing








    Previous|Next|Contents
    ERC/Kernel Working Group Meeting Report
    October 2004, Shanghai DC 2004
    John A. Kunze,[email protected]

    ERC/Kernel Demos and Software

    • Demo: California Digital Library collections

      http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/kt3489n8m4?
      • the ERC-writer module for this is available at

        //www.voudr.com/groups/kernel/ERC.pm.txt
    • Demo: Prototype ERC mappings for all PubMed identifiers

      http://ark.nlm.nih.gov/ark:/12025/pm10611131?
    • Demo: Web and Z39.50 interface (based on 1600 test ERCs)

      (web) http://www.awcubed.com/ERCsearch.html
      (z39.50) www.awcubed.com, port 210, dbname erc
    • Open-source search engines for ERC/Kernel metadata

      Amberfish: http://sourceforge.net/projects/amberfish/
      Isite: ftp://ftp.awcubed.com/pub/Software/Isite2/

    Previous|Next|Contents
    ERC/Kernel Working Group Meeting Report
    October 2004, Shanghai DC 2004
    John A. Kunze,[email protected]

    Creating best-practice guidelines

    • For applying the { who | what | when | where } questions to different object types in different disciplines

      erc/book: author | title | pub. year | ISBN or URL erc/photo: photographer | caption | date taken | URL erc/map: cartographer | region | mod. date | URL erc/article: author | title | pub. date | article URL ( + in: journal name | volume / issue | journal URL ) erc/painting: artist | identifier | date created | URL erc/artifact: discoverer | identifier | date found | URL erc/specimen: discoverer | identifier | date found | URL erc/code: programmer | title | mod. date | URL

    • 想要的:主题和应用领域专家to think through and debug mappings of kernel elements in their areas


    Previous|Next|Contents
    ERC/Kernel Working Group Meeting Report
    October 2004, Shanghai DC 2004
    John A. Kunze,[email protected]

    Kernel Working Group Recommended Next Steps

    • XML mapping continues to be a priority.

    • Documentation needs work, and should emphasize outreach.

    • How about ERCs for relationships and events? For example, describe a dissertation (a document) and link to its defense (an event).

    • Feedback suggests it may make sense to separate requirements; think about separately pursuing (a) required kernel elements, (b) ERC syntax, (c) null values for missing elements (which could use better indexing guidelines).

    • Question about maximizing and minimizing at the same time: how to reconcile the drives simultaneously to define a minimal record and to extend a vocabulary with additional elements?


    Previous|Next|Contents
    ERC/Kernel Working Group Meeting Report
    October 2004, Shanghai DC 2004
    John A. Kunze,[email protected]

    Reference Information

    • Background paper (DC 2001, Tokyo) still at

      http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v02/i02/Kunze/
    • To subscribe, visit

      http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/dc-kernel.html







    Previous| End |Contents
    ERC/Kernel Working Group Meeting Report
    October 2004, Shanghai DC 2004
    John A. Kunze,[email protected]